- 211
English School
Description
- English School
- Portrait of Elizabeth I (1533-1603)
- inscribed upper left.: Elizabeth .D.G. Regina; and upper right: Angliae Et Hibernia
- oil on panel
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
This recently discovered painting is based on a portrait of Elizabeth I by Quentyn Metsys the Younger painted in circa 1583 (Palazza Reale, Siena), and is an exiting addition to the catalogue of known images of the Queen. Known as the Sieve Portrait the prototype depicts the Queen as Tuccia, the Vestal Virgin who proved her chastity by carrying a sieve full of water from the Tiber to the Temple of Vesta. Celebrated both by Pliny the Elder, in his Natural History, and in Petrarch's Triumph of Chastity, the allusion to the vestal Tuccia ties in with other iconography from Elizabeth's reign, with its apparent interlinking of classical mythology and Renaissance imperialism. As such it serves as a clear metaphor for her identification as the Virgin Queen. As well as being symbolic of chastity the sieve was also emblematic of wisdom and discernment, and appeared thus in Whitney's Choice of Emblems published in 1586, the implication♓ thus being that Elizabeth's wise government is a di♐rect result of her virgin state.
Dendrochronology on the panel has revealed it to be of Baltic oak, a commonly used material in sixteenth century England, and provides an earliest date for the panel of 1575, and a likely usage date of between 1575 and 1607. This analysis confirms the opinion of Sir Roy Strong, who saw the painting from a photograph, and dated it 𝕴stylistically to the 1580s.