- 23
Henry Moore
Description
- Henry Moore
- Reclining Figure
- bronze
- length: 71.2cm.
- 28in.
Provenance
Galerie Thomas, Munich (a🍬cquireඣd from the above by 1981)
Acquired from the above by th🍎e father of the pres🧸ent owner in March 1988
Exhibited
Munich, Galerie Thomas, Sammlung Rheingarten, 1981, illustrated in colour in the catalogue
Literature
Alan Bowness (ed.), Henry Moore, Sculpture and Drawings - Sculpture 1955-64, London, 🃏1965, vol. III, no. 413, illustration of another cast pls. 38a & 38b
John Hedgecoe & Henry Moore, Henry Moore, London, 1968, illustration of ano🧜ther cast p💮. 235
David Mitchinson (ed.), Henry Moore Sculpture, London, ꦐ1981, no. 141, illustra൲tion of another cast in colour p. 141
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
He continuously returned to the motif throughout his career, using it as means for exploring new forms of expression. Christa Lichtenstern writes: ‘The reclining figure […] formed a kind of vessel into which Moore poured his most important poetic, compositional, formal and spatial discoveries. The farthest-reaching developments in his art are thus reflected in such figures. In the early period, they demonstrated his belief in the doctrine of direct carving. Later, they embodied his espousal of the surrealist emotionalisation of figure and space. And finally, they became a focus for the analogies between figure and landscape […]. One further innovation explored in the context of this basic theme was the artist’s discovery of rhythm as a constituent force in the generation of form’ (C. Lichtenstern, Henry Moore: Work – Theory – Impact, London, 2008, p. 95).