- 287
A drawing from an illustrated Gita Govinda series, artist of the first generation after Nainsukh, India, Kangra or Guler, circa 1775-80
Description
- drawing on paper
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
The illustration belongs to a series that is generally thought to be the preparatory drawings for what Goswamy and Fischer call the ‘Second’ Guler Gita Govinda series of circa 1775 (see Goswamy and Fischer ‘The First Generation’, p.689). This series is also known as the ‘First Kangra’ Gita Govinda or the ‘Tehri-Garhwal’ Gita Govinda from its supposed provenance (Archer 1973, vol.I, p.293). Archer attributed the series to the work of the sons of Nainsukh and Manaku, produced for the nuptials of Raja Sansar Chand of Kangra in 1781 (ibid. p.292).
Goswamy and Fischer now suggest that the sanguine under-drawing for the preparatory series is attributable to Nainsukh himself around 1770, and that the later overdrawing in ink was added after the painted series was finished, since the paintings often follows the sanguine under-drawing rather than the ink ‘tidyings-up’ (Goswamy and Fischer, ‘Nainsukh of Guler’ pp. 681-82). Only the most minute examination of the whole series of drawings and related paintings can confirm this assertion, but it must be pointed out that the sanguine under-drawing seen in the current lot and other examples is very much thinner and less masterful than the rare drawings only in sanguine that the same authors attribute to Nainsukh himself (e.g. ibid. fig. 15).