- 3638
AN IMPERIAL BEIJING ENAMEL 'GARDEN SCENE' SNUFF BOTTLE BLUE-ENAMEL MARK AND PERIOD OF QIANLONG
Description
- copper
Provenance
Sotheby's London, 9th May 1986, lot 286.
Exhibited
National Museum of Singapore, Singapore, 1994-5.
Robert Kleiner, Chinese Snuff Bottles in the Collection of Mary and George Bloch, British Museum, London, 1995, cat. no. 10.
Literature
Hugh Moss, Victor Graham and Ka Bo Tsang, A Treasury of Chinese Snuff Bottles: The Mary and George Bloch Collection, vol. 6, Hong Kong, 2007, no. 1083.
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
However, although it shares distinct characteristics with the J & J bottle, both with the same distinctive borders enclosing the garden scenes,and with the white spaces skilfully washed in places with blue to suggest sky, there are several key differences. The J & J bottle is typically Chinese in its style. The rocks, like the tree trunk, are painted with vigorous, calligraphic lines, and the scene is speckled with tradition💞al Chinese dotting to provide texture as much as to suggest moss and rough bark on rocks and trees, respectively, and the lines of the leaves are as much an exercise in brushwork as they are in depiction. On the current bottle, they are a little more subdued, more detailed and more descriptive than expressive, suggesting, perhaps, greater European influence.
This impression is confirmed by other elements of the design. The roses, seen from the front on one side, from the back on the other, are typically European, the one from the front resembling a heraldic Elizabethan rose in its formal layout. It is unusual for a Chinese artist working in enamels to depict a flower from the back. Front, side, or three-quarter views are more common in this art. There are other signs of a European hand. The grassy ground is completely filled with detail, including texturing to represent short grass, with blades of taller grass around the base of the rock. A Chinese designer would have been more likely to have made it simpler and less detailed. The rock is also very European in its depiction, without any hint of calligraphic line. It is painted to provide a realistic two-dimensional, logically shaded, Western impression of a three-dimensional objecꦓt.
Confirmation of a European hand may also be found in the lower decorative border, where an unusual configuration of the standard formalised lingzhi design appears, with the usual trefoil upper register, balanced, or rather unbalanced in Chinese terms, by a lower register of different shape, resembling more the standard head of a ruyi sceptre. This use of two different registers of formalized fungus is excep🍬tional. It appears on one other example from the collection of Mary and George Bloc🔯h, sold in these rooms, 27th May 2013, lot 212, beneath the lip and above the shoulder band.