168开奖官方开奖网站查询

拍品 1499
  • 1499

馬晉 (1900-1970) 春郊閱駿圖

估價
2,800,000 - 3,500,000 HKD
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • Ma Jin
  • ink and colour on silk, handscroll 
設色絹本 手卷
惠均署簽 徐邦達題跋

簽書:
春郊閱駿圖。孝同。

題跋 :
此近人馬晉的筆,馬學郎士寧尚可,佈景余不欲論之矣。海上徐邦達觀記。

鈐印:「孚尹」。

來源

二○○四年十一月得於北京

出版

〈榮寶齋畫譜〉第一四一期,畫馬部份·馬晉繪(北京,榮寶齋出版社,二○○二年七月),頁26-31

Condition

-A little foxing can be found. Otherwise, generally in good condition.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

拍品資料及來源

註:郎世寧〈春郊閱駿圖卷〉繪製於乾隆九年,唐岱補繪樹石,內府收藏。「庚子拳變」時流出宮外,為金拱北得於琉璃廠。他珍同拱璧,據其子金潛厂言「視為平生收藏清畫之冠」。一九一七年秋首屆「京師書畫展覽會」中,將此卷公諸於世。金氏過世,潛厂承父業,孜孜於古法傳播及與日本書畫界交流,一九二八年攜此畫參加東京「唐宋元明畫展覽會」。他最終將此卷轉售藤井善助,入藏藤井齊成會有鄰館。

按郎世寧此卷衍生而出者眾:其一為清宮廷畫家姚文瀚在郎氏過世後依乾隆之囑再繪,卷中畫法沿襲郎氏一路,位置景致皆據其本,惟諸馬動態毛色則出己意,乾隆之形象亦較蒼老。

其二為湖社弟子馮諄對臨本,今亦歸有鄰館。〈湖社月刊〉一九三○年曾分七次刊登郎世寧〈春郊閱駿圖卷〉,仍注明為金潛厂收藏。一九三四年春,馮諄依潛厂所囑對臨。是年四月末,金氏攜古畫及時人作品赴日參加密宗講演大會;郎、馮二卷或許是次一并轉售藤井。

其三即為本卷。馬晉對臨,無款印,具「湖社」社友惠柘湖題簽及徐邦達跋。徐氏對馬晉臨郎世寧馬無不誇讚。馬晉少年從清宮畫家習畫,醉心於郎世寧畫風,曾臨摹其〈十駿圖〉、〈百駿圖〉、〈羚羊圖〉等,二十世紀臨仿郎氏者無出其右。馬晉十八歲投金城門下,獲賜號「雲湖」,二一年金城為其擬定潤格,二五年二人以合寫作品參加中日繪畫展覽,器重之甚矣。金氏過世,湖社成立,馬晉雖非其中骨幹,仍給學員作點評、為〈湖社月刊〉供稿,故金潛厂請人摹寫郎氏作品留作資料、教學之用,馬晉實為不二人選。卷上未具款印,更印證此臨本用作資料。馬晉、馮諄二人,畫功、輩分,皆有差別,各臨郎氏一本,潛厂釋出時,當自留更佳者。

馬晉此本用絹為上品,細密堅韌,應為宮絹,無論人馬樹石,與郎氏一卷細節幾無紕漏,應照原作嚴格對臨而成,可謂下真跡一等之作。其中乾隆與侍從畫像,更是馬晉極少涉獵之人物寫真。

另有謂此卷乃馬晉畫馬,祁崑補景。他們為民國時期臨寫清宮畫作之翹楚,多有合作。然此卷嚴格對臨,隱去二人畫風之本貌,且無文字佐証,僅存此一說,不妄下結論。